Skip to content
Security analyst monitoring live camera feeds in an operations centre.

Platform module

Sensitive operations, compartmentalised and logged.

Run covert investigations, integrity testing and polygraph sessions on a need-to-know basis — with restricted access, a full audit trail and POPIA-aligned handling of every subject record.

Need-to-know case files · Restricted access roles · Polygraph session logs tied to investigations · Full audit trail · POPIA-aligned

The problem

Sensitive work leaks when it lives outside the system.

Covert operations handled on spreadsheets, personal phones and email threads expose subjects, sources and the business itself.

🕵️

Everyone can see everything

Without compartmentalisation, a covert file is one shared drive away from tipping off the subject and collapsing the operation.

📄

No defensible record

Polygraph results and integrity findings kept off-system can’t be tied to a case, a date or an examiner — and won’t survive scrutiny.

⚖️

Privacy exposure

Handling subject data without lawful basis, consent tracking or retention control creates real POPIA and reputational risk.

How it works

From authorisation to closure, on a need-to-know footing.

Authorise. A covert case is opened under restricted access — only named, cleared roles can see it exists.

Compartmentalise. Evidence, sources and notes sit in the case with role-based visibility, so contributors see only their slice.

Examine. Polygraph sessions are booked and logged against the investigation, with examiner, consent and outcome captured.

Escalate. Findings feed the investigation and, where warranted, an incident — without ever widening the circle.

Close. The case closes with a complete, timestamped audit trail and a retention rule applied to subject data.

Capabilities

Built for the operations you can’t talk about.

🔐

Compartmentalised case files

Need-to-know structure keeps each covert operation sealed to the people cleared for it.

👤

Restricted access roles

Granular, role-based permissions govern who can open, view, edit or even discover a case.

📈

Polygraph session logs

Every session is tied to an investigation with examiner, date, consent and result recorded.

🧾

Full audit trail

Immutable, timestamped history of every view, edit and export — defensible after the fact.

🛡️

POPIA-aligned handling

Lawful-basis notes, consent capture and retention rules for sensitive subject data.

🔗

Tied to investigations

Covert findings link cleanly into case management and incidents without breaking compartmentalisation.

On the data spine

One record, shared only where it should be.

Covert operations sit on the same data spine as the rest of MiMs, but under stricter walls. A polygraph result can escalate into an investigation and an incident, and every hop is logged — while access stays locked to cleared roles across all your sites.

What feeds it

  • Investigation case management
  • Incident reports flagged sensitive
  • Restricted user roles and clearances
  • Polygraph examiner schedules

What it feeds

  • Investigation case management
  • Incident management (on escalation)
  • The document library (sealed evidence)
  • The audit trail and reporting
“We can finally run a covert operation without half the team knowing it exists. The polygraph logs sit with the case, and the audit trail means the outcome holds up when it matters.”
Head of InvestigationsMining · South Africa

Attribution withheld under NDA to protect ongoing operations.

FAQ

Covert operations & polygraph, answered.

Who can see a covert case?

Only named roles you clear for it. Compartmentalised case files are invisible to everyone else — they can’t view, edit or discover that the case exists.

Are polygraph sessions recorded in the system?

Yes. Each session is logged against its investigation with the examiner, date, consent and outcome, so results are always tied to a case rather than floating in isolation.

How does this stay POPIA-aligned?

Sensitive subject data carries lawful-basis notes, consent capture and retention rules, and every access is written to an immutable audit trail. MiMs is POPIA-aligned by design.

Can a covert finding become a formal incident?

When warranted, a finding escalates into an investigation or incident. The escalation is logged and access stays compartmentalised — the circle only widens when you decide it should.

Does it work across multiple sites?

Yes. Restricted roles and clearances apply consistently across every site on your data spine, so a national operation stays sealed end to end.

Ready when you are

See how MiMs keeps sensitive operations sealed and defensible.